<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prism and Extensions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/</link>
	<description>A narrative on the future of web browsers and web browsing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:41:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Labs &#187; prism &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Prism Updated, Planning Next Steps</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Labs &#187; prism &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Prism Updated, Planning Next Steps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>[...] version of Firefox, rather than as a XULRunner application. This will have the advantage of making Firefox extensions work on Prism without modification. For example, Weave running on Prism will allow for profile synchronization, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] version of Firefox, rather than as a XULRunner application. This will have the advantage of making Firefox extensions work on Prism without modification. For example, Weave running on Prism will allow for profile synchronization, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uriel</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>Uriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tips matt. Just to double-check, the &quot;&quot; and ID should be in the same &quot;chrome.manifest&quot; file, right? I wasn&#039;t sure.

I&#039;m a big fan of prism but yeah lack of extensions is definitely keeping me from using it more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tips matt. Just to double-check, the &#8220;&#8221; and ID should be in the same &#8220;chrome.manifest&#8221; file, right? I wasn&#8217;t sure.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of prism but yeah lack of extensions is definitely keeping me from using it more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefox 3.6 beta 1 &#124; hocteto.com</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>firefox 3.6 beta 1 &#124; hocteto.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>[...] el proyecto personas se incorpora a firefox. Así que es posible y deseable que prism finalmente se base en completamente en firefox en vez de xulrunner y termine incorporándose a firefox al igual que personas. De la misma forma que chrome permite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] el proyecto personas se incorpora a firefox. Así que es posible y deseable que prism finalmente se base en completamente en firefox en vez de xulrunner y termine incorporándose a firefox al igual que personas. De la misma forma que chrome permite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gertner</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>There is certainly scope for discussing some sort of unification of Firefox and Prism. I do believe that the use case for running a web app is different from that of a web browser, and that the UI should be adapted accordingly. But some degree of customization for Prism apps should certainly be an option; for example, whether to have a menu bar or not could be up to the web app itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is certainly scope for discussing some sort of unification of Firefox and Prism. I do believe that the use case for running a web app is different from that of a web browser, and that the UI should be adapted accordingly. But some degree of customization for Prism apps should certainly be an option; for example, whether to have a menu bar or not could be up to the web app itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laisvunas</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Laisvunas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>You think in the right direction but not entirely consistently. 

It is essentially correct that Prism should be just Firefox scaled down, but who sould decide what should be stripped from Firefox and what retained? 

Currently Prism&#039;s creators decide this, but I think that this should be entirely up to developers of Prism apps - they should be able to strip or retain just any of Firefox GUI element; and if developer wishes (however it might seem strange) he must be able to recreate even entire browser.

And of course to be able to install any Firefox extension is essential.

Prism having ability to strip or include any Firefox GUI element and install any Firefox extension will become a strong platform for a new kind of browser-centric applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think in the right direction but not entirely consistently. </p>
<p>It is essentially correct that Prism should be just Firefox scaled down, but who sould decide what should be stripped from Firefox and what retained? </p>
<p>Currently Prism&#8217;s creators decide this, but I think that this should be entirely up to developers of Prism apps &#8211; they should be able to strip or retain just any of Firefox GUI element; and if developer wishes (however it might seem strange) he must be able to recreate even entire browser.</p>
<p>And of course to be able to install any Firefox extension is essential.</p>
<p>Prism having ability to strip or include any Firefox GUI element and install any Firefox extension will become a strong platform for a new kind of browser-centric applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>I really like the idea that Prism could be just Firefox scaled down.  

Like you mentioned with extensions, something like browser plugins would be beneficial too. 

It is pretty much just rethinking the purpose of the browser. No need for bookmarks or back/forward buttons. Tabs could only be of use for a specific app like Google Docs. Each iteration it&#039;s own process(es), and maybe its own local storage.

Whoops... I just realized this sounds alot like Google Chrome.

Maybe the new proposed design changes for the future versions of firefox would benefit Prism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the idea that Prism could be just Firefox scaled down.  </p>
<p>Like you mentioned with extensions, something like browser plugins would be beneficial too. </p>
<p>It is pretty much just rethinking the purpose of the browser. No need for bookmarks or back/forward buttons. Tabs could only be of use for a specific app like Google Docs. Each iteration it&#8217;s own process(es), and maybe its own local storage.</p>
<p>Whoops&#8230; I just realized this sounds alot like Google Chrome.</p>
<p>Maybe the new proposed design changes for the future versions of firefox would benefit Prism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gertner</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>Hey Ben,

I would say the advantages are quite close to those of standalone apps, but it&#039;s much easier to develop a Prism app that duplicates the functionality of the web site. Twitter has a lot of standalone apps but most sites don&#039;t, so Prism provides a strong alternative.

You might have missed my &lt;a href=&quot;http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/01/14/browser-trends-site-specific-browsers/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;earlier post&lt;/a&gt; on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ben,</p>
<p>I would say the advantages are quite close to those of standalone apps, but it&#8217;s much easier to develop a Prism app that duplicates the functionality of the web site. Twitter has a lot of standalone apps but most sites don&#8217;t, so Prism provides a strong alternative.</p>
<p>You might have missed my <a href="http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/01/14/browser-trends-site-specific-browsers/" rel="nofollow">earlier post</a> on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>I looked at prism months ago and didn&#039;t really get it. Can you, Matt, explain to me, Ben, as a layman, what would be one or two good uses for prism? I use stand-alone apps for certain things, like Tweetie and Shifd, so I see how a customizable application could be helpful, but I&#039;m not sure when I would benefit from Prism instead of downloading a specialized application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at prism months ago and didn&#8217;t really get it. Can you, Matt, explain to me, Ben, as a layman, what would be one or two good uses for prism? I use stand-alone apps for certain things, like Tweetie and Shifd, so I see how a customizable application could be helpful, but I&#8217;m not sure when I would benefit from Prism instead of downloading a specialized application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1969</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-1969</guid>
		<description>Oh please do this.  I have been waiting for two years for Prism to be easily extension-able.  So many of the sites I use Prism for are the ones that I want to have site-specific extensions working for in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please do this.  I have been waiting for two years for Prism to be easily extension-able.  So many of the sites I use Prism for are the ones that I want to have site-specific extensions working for in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Just Browsing » Prism and Extensions -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/10/22/prism-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Just Browsing » Prism and Extensions -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/?p=102#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet Mozilla, jeromatron. jeromatron said: How to get #firefox extensions to work with #mozilla #prism - current state of development... http://is.gd/4w3f7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet Mozilla, jeromatron. jeromatron said: How to get #firefox extensions to work with #mozilla #prism &#8211; current state of development&#8230; <a href="http://is.gd/4w3f7" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/4w3f7</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
