<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do We Need a Firefox OS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/</link>
	<description>A narrative on the future of web browsers and web browsing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyao</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeyao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>Why not ?

Mozilla is application platform, not just a browser. So why not is it be a mozilla os ? There are plenty of extensions and plugins on mozilla platform. It&#039;s time to go for internet users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not ?</p>
<p>Mozilla is application platform, not just a browser. So why not is it be a mozilla os ? There are plenty of extensions and plugins on mozilla platform. It&#8217;s time to go for internet users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dionte</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Dionte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>&quot;This leaves Mozilla as the only major browser vendor which doesn’t have an operating system. &quot;

Opera has just about the same number of users as Chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This leaves Mozilla as the only major browser vendor which doesn’t have an operating system. &#8221;</p>
<p>Opera has just about the same number of users as Chrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inflecto Systems  (Web Based Software)</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Inflecto Systems  (Web Based Software)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>Yes we need Firefox! Firefox has been the best browser around for many years now and has been light years ahead in terms of standards compliance for ages.

I don&#039;t foresee Google chrome taking much of Firefox browser share. I can see the possibility of some of the IE users however moving to chrome which can only be a good thing especially if they are some of the IE 5 / IE 6 users I am constantly having to write hacks for to support!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we need Firefox! Firefox has been the best browser around for many years now and has been light years ahead in terms of standards compliance for ages.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t foresee Google chrome taking much of Firefox browser share. I can see the possibility of some of the IE users however moving to chrome which can only be a good thing especially if they are some of the IE 5 / IE 6 users I am constantly having to write hacks for to support!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gertner</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>Some sort of wide adoption of a standard that preserves precise formatting across different office suites would certainly be a big step forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some sort of wide adoption of a standard that preserves precise formatting across different office suites would certainly be a big step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Drinkwater</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>John Drinkwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>‘I talk to people constantly who won’t even switch to Mac Office because it isn’t compatible enough with the Windows version.’
That’s half the reason Microsoft makes a cut-down version for Mac, it keeps bosses from allowing staff to use the native apps, and keeps full migrations to Mac from happening. (I’d also call it an anti-trust issue, but you can’t have everything)

This problem is trying to be solved by OpenOffice.org et al standardising ODF, as now nearly all* the office software suites have or are implementing ODF support, so this looks to be the way out from the Office stranglehold. Maybe Mozilla can help this along.

*Only notable exception is Apple’s iWork. go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘I talk to people constantly who won’t even switch to Mac Office because it isn’t compatible enough with the Windows version.’<br />
That’s half the reason Microsoft makes a cut-down version for Mac, it keeps bosses from allowing staff to use the native apps, and keeps full migrations to Mac from happening. (I’d also call it an anti-trust issue, but you can’t have everything)</p>
<p>This problem is trying to be solved by OpenOffice.org et al standardising ODF, as now nearly all* the office software suites have or are implementing ODF support, so this looks to be the way out from the Office stranglehold. Maybe Mozilla can help this along.</p>
<p>*Only notable exception is Apple’s iWork. go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>I think firefox should stick to what they know... building a great browser... but lately, they have fallen behind in terms of speed to Chrome. So, I think the effort should be concentrated on getting back out in front of the Chrome team in terms of speed.

Given that Firefox4 will have multiple processes, and a compelte Weave 1.0 (hopefully), I think firefox will be an OS in its own right.

The whole concept of OS&#039;s being replaced by a computer that boots into a browser is going to take 6-10 years to change... its a massive paradigm shift.

For the meantime, I think that COS will only speak to a niche market until everything... &quot;EVERYTHING.... that is games, apps, etc...&quot; is online. Which will eventually happen, but were not there yet.

So, hold up on the FxOS and let FirefoxNext be the best browser in the world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think firefox should stick to what they know&#8230; building a great browser&#8230; but lately, they have fallen behind in terms of speed to Chrome. So, I think the effort should be concentrated on getting back out in front of the Chrome team in terms of speed.</p>
<p>Given that Firefox4 will have multiple processes, and a compelte Weave 1.0 (hopefully), I think firefox will be an OS in its own right.</p>
<p>The whole concept of OS&#8217;s being replaced by a computer that boots into a browser is going to take 6-10 years to change&#8230; its a massive paradigm shift.</p>
<p>For the meantime, I think that COS will only speak to a niche market until everything&#8230; &#8220;EVERYTHING&#8230;. that is games, apps, etc&#8230;&#8221; is online. Which will eventually happen, but were not there yet.</p>
<p>So, hold up on the FxOS and let FirefoxNext be the best browser in the world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt (supernova_00)</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt (supernova_00)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>Another vote for not creating an OS.  Mozilla knows and creates browsers and should just leave it at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another vote for not creating an OS.  Mozilla knows and creates browsers and should just leave it at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunes</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>nunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>Mozillo shouldn&#039;t need a OS. First like on eof the comments sais, they can just load Firefox on Chrome OS and they will have the OS + Browser.
But second, i don&#039;t think Chrome OS will be just a browser + OS. They will redesign the OS, so I expect a better OS-Browser integration than we have today.
This is being done with Prism, and multiplatform. So Mozilla should bet on Prism and a better Desktop integration, to allow the depelopers to design a full desktop application with web technologies. That&#039;s the aim of Chrome but the mistake of google, in my opinion, is to make and use an specific OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozillo shouldn&#8217;t need a OS. First like on eof the comments sais, they can just load Firefox on Chrome OS and they will have the OS + Browser.<br />
But second, i don&#8217;t think Chrome OS will be just a browser + OS. They will redesign the OS, so I expect a better OS-Browser integration than we have today.<br />
This is being done with Prism, and multiplatform. So Mozilla should bet on Prism and a better Desktop integration, to allow the depelopers to design a full desktop application with web technologies. That&#8217;s the aim of Chrome but the mistake of google, in my opinion, is to make and use an specific OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>I need my hard drive. I want to be able to share my documents with other people, even if they don&#039;t have a Google account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need my hard drive. I want to be able to share my documents with other people, even if they don&#8217;t have a Google account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veera</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Veera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2009/07/08/do-we-need-a-firefox-os/#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s natural for a company like Google to build a product centered around web. It has already done that with Chrome, now it is just extending it to reach a wider market. 

Open sourcing the Chrome OS is a good market strategy, which may attract developers towards the new OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s natural for a company like Google to build a product centered around web. It has already done that with Chrome, now it is just extending it to reach a wider market. </p>
<p>Open sourcing the Chrome OS is a good market strategy, which may attract developers towards the new OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
