<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on XULRunner, Part Two: One XULRunner to Rule Them All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/</link>
	<description>A narrative on the future of web browsers and web browsing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:41:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avery</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>A geek that’s also a diplomat? This would mean Star Trek fans that like Deep Space Nine more than the other series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A geek that’s also a diplomat? This would mean Star Trek fans that like Deep Space Nine more than the other series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mozilla Foundation and Platform Developers &#171; davidwboswell</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mozilla Foundation and Platform Developers &#171; davidwboswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>[...] can help by organizing, guiding and facilitating &#8212; what Matthew Gertner has identified as a diplomatic mission that would make developers&#8217; lives easier (both core developers and developers using the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can help by organizing, guiding and facilitating &#8212; what Matthew Gertner has identified as a diplomatic mission that would make developers&#8217; lives easier (both core developers and developers using the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paradise Road: Ken&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mozilla Gecko Office - Why Not?</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>Paradise Road: Ken&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mozilla Gecko Office - Why Not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>[...] be the single best way to turn XUL-runner into the ultimate stand-alone platform like some have recently talked about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be the single best way to turn XUL-runner into the ultimate stand-alone platform like some have recently talked about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gertner</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>Noel,

Can you be more specific? What exactly turned the shared runtime into a nightmare? In my naive imagination, one would simply have a versioned shared runtime and download a new version when necessary, leaving older versions as long as there are still apps on the machine that don&#039;t support the newer version.

Although disk space is not a major consideration, download size still is. But I agree that there is a case for simply bundling a XULRunner with each app if versioning is really going to be a nightmare, even though I still feel that a unified codebase has many other advantages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel,</p>
<p>Can you be more specific? What exactly turned the shared runtime into a nightmare? In my naive imagination, one would simply have a versioned shared runtime and download a new version when necessary, leaving older versions as long as there are still apps on the machine that don&#8217;t support the newer version.</p>
<p>Although disk space is not a major consideration, download size still is. But I agree that there is a case for simply bundling a XULRunner with each app if versioning is really going to be a nightmare, even though I still feel that a unified codebase has many other advantages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Grandin</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Grandin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>A shared runtime is a really really bad idea.
That&#039;s just another variant on DLL-hell.

I can speak from experience because I&#039;ve been doing Java for 10 years, and suffering the pain that comes from using a &quot;shared runtime&quot;.

Please don&#039;t repeat Sun&#039;s mistake.

You&#039;d be much better off just focusing on making XULRunner easier to package and install as part of a third-party app.

Really, what does a shared-runtime gain us in these days of 100GB+ disks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shared runtime is a really really bad idea.<br />
That&#8217;s just another variant on DLL-hell.</p>
<p>I can speak from experience because I&#8217;ve been doing Java for 10 years, and suffering the pain that comes from using a &#8220;shared runtime&#8221;.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t repeat Sun&#8217;s mistake.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d be much better off just focusing on making XULRunner easier to package and install as part of a third-party app.</p>
<p>Really, what does a shared-runtime gain us in these days of 100GB+ disks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gertner</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Ian - I don&#039;t. What&#039;s so ironic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian &#8211; I don&#8217;t. What&#8217;s so ironic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Thomas (thelem)</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Thomas (thelem)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else see the irony in &quot;musing about&quot; a &quot;lack of clear goals&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else see the irony in &#8220;musing about&#8221; a &#8220;lack of clear goals&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caffeine Lab &#187; Sharing XULRunner between applications</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Caffeine Lab &#187; Sharing XULRunner between applications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>[...] Matthew Gertner proposes that all XULRunner applications (including Firefox) should share the same XULRunner instance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matthew Gertner proposes that all XULRunner applications (including Firefox) should share the same XULRunner instance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deriuqer</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>deriuqer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/08/14/thoughts-on-xulrunner-part-two-one-xulrunner-to-rule-them-all/#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>A geek that&#039;s also a diplomat? This would mean Star Trek fans that like Deep Space Nine more than the other series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A geek that&#8217;s also a diplomat? This would mean Star Trek fans that like Deep Space Nine more than the other series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
