<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Devices and the Browser Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/01/10/mobile-devices-and-the-browser-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/01/10/mobile-devices-and-the-browser-wars/</link>
	<description>A narrative on the future of web browsers and web browsing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:41:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: YAG</title>
		<link>http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/01/10/mobile-devices-and-the-browser-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>YAG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsing.justdiscourse.com/2008/01/10/mobile-devices-and-the-browser-wars/#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>Interesting to read how the browser wars are hottest now on mobile devices.

Seems to me that Opera has put a tremendous effort on making mobile their new focus. While IE and FF are tied up with desktops, Opera has marked “everywhere else”  as their &quot;niche&quot; market, so they started popping up on cellphones, Playstation, PSP etc…

There are some new contenders in this space altogether such as skyfire that are getting top reviews – so the winner could still be a new player altogether.

There is no discussion though of what users would find more useful and productive, but rather a convenience argument that people will use what they got on their mobile as a default. This has been true for desktops as well. IE doesn’t hold ~75% market share because it is better – but rather because you get it with windows. Having said that, FF did grow to 25%. Perhaps though the key point is to become a default browser on certain platforms through deals with the platform developers – this way you ARE the default that people get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to read how the browser wars are hottest now on mobile devices.</p>
<p>Seems to me that Opera has put a tremendous effort on making mobile their new focus. While IE and FF are tied up with desktops, Opera has marked “everywhere else”  as their &#8220;niche&#8221; market, so they started popping up on cellphones, Playstation, PSP etc…</p>
<p>There are some new contenders in this space altogether such as skyfire that are getting top reviews – so the winner could still be a new player altogether.</p>
<p>There is no discussion though of what users would find more useful and productive, but rather a convenience argument that people will use what they got on their mobile as a default. This has been true for desktops as well. IE doesn’t hold ~75% market share because it is better – but rather because you get it with windows. Having said that, FF did grow to 25%. Perhaps though the key point is to become a default browser on certain platforms through deals with the platform developers – this way you ARE the default that people get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
